Crouse-Hinds, Syracuse: public records and work-history research
Crouse-Hinds has a long Syracuse manufacturing history. Company and court records help place the Wolf Street operation, its electrical-manufacturing context and asbestos-litigation history alongside the individual worker’s building, trade and years.
What the public record documents
Crouse-Hinds grew from a Syracuse electrical manufacturer
Eaton's official Crouse-Hinds history describes the company operating from a small downtown Syracuse building in the early 1900s and later purchasing 25 acres in northern Syracuse as the Condulet and lighting businesses expanded.
A federal court record traces the manufacturing site to about 1911
In federal environmental litigation, the Northern District of New York recounted that Crouse-Hinds constructed a manufacturing facility near Seventh North Street and Wolf Street in approximately 1911 and that the facility was operated by the company or successors for decades.
The Crouse-Hinds name remains tied to Syracuse
Eaton's current contact information lists its Crouse-Hinds series operation at 1201 Wolf Street, Syracuse. Current brand continuity should be kept separate from historical product and workplace questions.
New York asbestos case-management materials identify the successor entity
A 2026 New York Courts asbestos case-management exhibit lists Cooper Industries, individually and as successor to Crouse-Hinds, among companies named in asbestos litigation administered in the Third through Seventh Judicial Districts.
What the records tell us
The public record supplies a documented starting point. The next step is to match that history to the individual person’s years, work area, occupation, tasks, equipment, contractors and coworkers.
Questions for a Crouse-Hinds work-history reconstruction
Building, foundry or department?
Wolf Street or another site; main plant, foundry, machine area, assembly, maintenance, warehouse, engineering or contractor work; approximate years.
What products or processes?
Conduit fittings, castings, electrical enclosures, machining, molding, maintenance, furnaces, boilers, steam systems, insulation or building work should be investigated as separate factual threads.
What did the person actually do?
Job title is only a starting point. Tasks, tools, adjacent trades, repair work, shutdowns and cleanup can be more informative than the title alone.
What records can test the memory?
Coworkers, union records, plant maps, manuals, product catalogs, purchase records, contractor records, public litigation documents and historical photographs may help narrow the question.
How the workplace memory becomes useful
A person may remember Crouse-Hinds, Wolf Street, an electrical trade or foundry, and a decade. Those details can be connected to plant history, occupations, products, processes and successor records to guide the next investigation.
Related H&S research: electricians, electrical equipment, machinists, maintenance-task evidence, and Central New York research.
Primary and authoritative sources
- Eaton — Crouse-Hinds series Condulet history Company history
- Eaton — Crouse-Hinds series Syracuse contact information Current company record
- U.S. District Court, N.D.N.Y. — Cooper Crouse-Hinds v. City of Syracuse Federal court record
- New York Courts — asbestos litigation case-management exhibit Court administration record
Research method
H&S links the underlying records and adds more specific historical details when reliable sources support them.
Read our editorial and evidence standards → Start with what you remember →